Brooks v. Cox et al
ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to 22 Motion to Dismiss within 15 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' request to extend time to file a summary judgment motion, pending resolution of their 22 Motion to Dismiss, is granted. The Court will set a new dispositive motions deadline following resolution of the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/26/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
SUSAN COX, et al.
Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) within fifteen days
of the date of this Order.
Failure to respond shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of
Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to prosecute.
See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
Defendants’ request to extend time to file a Summary Judgment Motion, pending resolution
of their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED.
The Court will set a new dispositive
motions deadline following resolution of the Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2018.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?