Brooks v. Cox et al

Filing 25

ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to 22 Motion to Dismiss within 15 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' request to extend time to file a summary judgment motion, pending resolution of their 22 Motion to Dismiss, is granted. The Court will set a new dispositive motions deadline following resolution of the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/26/2018. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JEREMIE BROOKS,
ADC #660149
v.

PLAINTIFF

3:17CV00055-DPM-JTK

SUSAN COX, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) within fifteen days
of the date of this Order.

Failure to respond shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of

Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to prosecute.

See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

Defendants’ request to extend time to file a Summary Judgment Motion, pending resolution
of their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED.

The Court will set a new dispositive

motions deadline following resolution of the Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of February, 2018.

____________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1