Dickerson v. Social Security Administration

Filing 16

ORDER reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding this case for action consistent with this opinion. This is a "sentence four" remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/20/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION SUSAN ANN DICKERSON, * * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 3:17cv00077-JJV ORDER Defendant has filed a Motion to Remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g) (1995): The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and to issue a new decision. Defendant states Plaintiff=s attorney was contacted and stated he had no objection to the requested remand. Under the circumstances, a sentence four remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Commissioner=s decision is reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion. This is a "sentence four" remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this 20th day of November, 2017. ____________________________________ JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?