Rupert v. Boyd et al

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 16 Partial Recommended Disposition and overruling 18 Rupert's objections. Rupert's access-to-the-courts claim and all his claims against Boyd are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/23/2017. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
PRENTIS RUPERT

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 3:17-cv-92-DPM-JTR

MARTY BOYD, Sheriff, Craighead County
Detention Center; BOWER, Admin,
Craighead County Detention Center;
and GIBSON, CO, Craighead County
Detention Facility

DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommended
disposition, NQ 16, and overrules Rupert's objections, NQ 18.

F ED.

R. CIV.

P. 72(b)(3). If Rupert wants to revise his claims against Boyd, then he must do
so in an amended complaint, not in his objections. Rupert's access-to-thecourts claim and all his claims against Boyd are dismissed without prejudice.
An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.