Johnson et al v. Arkansas State University et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT consistent with the Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Mr. Johnson's claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and his claim for breach of contract is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/6/2017. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
RYAN ANTHONY JOHNSON

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00093-JM-BD
ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED,
ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Mr. Johnson’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982,
1983, 1985, 1986, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and his claim for breach of
contract is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of September, 2017.

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE