Johnson et al v. Arkansas State University et al
JUDGMENT consistent with the Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Mr. Johnson's claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and his claim for breach of contract is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/6/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RYAN ANTHONY JOHNSON
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00093-JM-BD
ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.
Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED,
ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Mr. Johnson’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982,
1983, 1985, 1986, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and his claim for breach of
contract is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of September, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?