Mitchell v. Cox et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 5 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Mitchell's lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/4/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION JAMES MITCHELL v. PLAINTIFF Case No: 3:17-cv-00131 KGB/BD SUSAN COX; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received a Recommended Disposition filed by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 5). On May 30, 2017, Judge Deere ordered plaintiff James Mitchell to file an amended complaint containing additional factual allegations (Dkt. No. 4). Judge Deere recommends the dismissal of Mr. Mitchell’s complaint for lack of prosecution because Mr. Mitchell did not file an amended complaint within 30 days of her Order directing him to do so (Dkt. No. 5). Mr. Mitchell filed objections to Judge Deere’s Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 6). His objections do not respond to the deficiencies in his complaint identified in Judge Deere’s previous Order. Mr. Mitchell submitted another document for the Court to review (Dkt. No. 7). This document is not an amended complaint, and it also does not correct the deficiencies in his complaint. Therefore, after careful review of the Recommended Disposition, Mr. Mitchell’s timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 5). Mr. Mitchell’s lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this the 4th day of August, 2017. __________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?