Nixon v. Hitt et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 9 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Nixon's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this act ion counts as a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/24/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION RONNIE NIXON V. PLAINTIFF NO: 3:17CV00138 JM/PSH BECKY HITT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Nixon’s claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 24th day of August, 2017. _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?