Covington v. American Railcar Industries Inc
Filing
23
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/23/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
JAMES COVINGTON, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendant.
Civil Action No.:3:17-cv-145-JLH
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS AND
COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion for Final Approval of the
Class and Collective Action Settlement. The Court had previously granted preliminary approval
of the parties' Settlement Agreement in this case and had authorized notice to be sent to
potentially impacted Class Members. 1 That notice gave interested persons until April 19, 2018,
to object to the settlement. No objections were filed. Given that no objections were filed, and
following a hearing on the Motions held in Court on May 14, 2018, the Court finds as follows:
1.
For the reasons set forth herein, final approval of the parties' settlement, under the
terms and conditions set forth in the parties' Settlement Agreement previously filed under seal
with the Court, is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that a class should be certified for
settlement purposes only consisting of all current or former hourly paid production employees
who work or worked at American Railcar' s Paragould Manufacturing facility located in
Paragould, Arkansas, at any time between June 6, 2014 and January 10, 2018. The class consists
1 For
the purposes of this Order, capitalized terms have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement Agreement.
6753148
1
of all current or former employees meeting the preceding definition. However, no Fair Labor
Standards Act claims were released by Class Members who did not opt in or file a claim. The
Court further finds that the parties' settlement is fair and reasonable to those settlement class
members. The Court approves the releases of claims contained in the parties' Settlement
Agreement with respect to these individuals, which includes a release of claims under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.
2.
There is a bona fide dispute between the parties over the amount of compensation
due and owing to the Class Members. The Settlement reflects a reasonable and negotiated
compromise of the parties' respective claims and defenses, and was reached after protracted,
contested, arm's length negotiations conducted over a period of months.
3.
The Court finds and has determined that on March 5, 2018, the approved notice
and claim form was timely sent in accordance with the Court's Order by first class mail, postage
prepaid, to 1,751 individuals who were current or former hourly paid production employees who
work or worked at American Railcar' s Paragould Manufacturing facility located in Paragould,
Arkansas, at any time between June 6, 2014 and January 10, 2018. Notices were sent to last
known addresses by IL YM Group, Inc., the Claims Administrator, and updated using National
Change of Address program certified by the United States Postal Service. For any returned
Notices, the Claims Administrator performed a skip trace to search for updated addresses.
4.
Four Hundred Ninety Two (492) Class Members submitted timely claims, three
(3) Class Members submitted untimely claims, one person elected to exclude himself or herself
from the class, and no Class Member filed an objection to the settlement.
5.
The notice to the Class was completed according to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and the Court's prior Preliminary Approval Order. The notice given to the Class
6753148
2
Members, which set forth the principal terms of the Settlement Agreement and other matters,
was the best practicable notice under the circumstances. This notice process prescribed by the
Settlement Agreement and the Court's Preliminary Approval Order was reasonable and provided
due and adequate notice of these proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the
terms of the Settlement Agreement, to all parties entitled to such notice. Notice given to the
Class Members was reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise Class Members of
the pendency of this action, all material elements of the Settlement, and their opportunity to
exclude themselves from, to object to, or to comment on the Settlement and to appear at the final
fairness hearing. A full opportunity to be heard has been afforded to all Class Members, and
other persons wishing to be heard. Accordingly, the Court determines that all members of the
Class, except to the extent such Class Members have timely excluded themselves from the
Settlement Class, are bound by this Judgment and Final Order.
6.
The Court hereby approves the Settlement and finds that the Settlement is, in all
respects, lawful, fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class, within the authority of the parties,
and the result of extensive arm's length negotiations that resolve and compromise genuine and
bona fide disputes between the parties. The Court hereby grants final approval to the Settlement
and finds that it is lawful, fair, reasonable and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class as a
whole. The parties are ordered to comply with the corrected Settlement Agreement.
7.
American Railcar Industries, Inc. ("ARI") shall pay each Class Member who has
not opted to be excluded from this action and who has submitted a qualifying claim in
accordance with and upon the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Leonard Baker, Kizech
Washington, Kyesha Brown, and Jai Hunt are granted leave to file their respective claims out of
6753148
3
time and shall be deemed to have timely filed their claims. No other late-filed claims shall be
allowed.
8.
ARI shall allocate the settlement payments as set forth in the Settlement
Agreement for the purposes of taxing them and withholding appropriate deductions and
withholdings accordingly. Each Class Member who is paid a claim shall be solely responsible for
any income or other taxes, interest, or penalties owed with respect to any payment to him or her as a
result of this Judgment and Final Order. The payments to any Class Member described in this
Judgment and Final Order shall not constitute nor be considered as compensation for purposes of
any applicable benefit, bonus, profit sharing, or pension plans, and no Class Member will be
entitled to any additional payments or benefits by reason of any such payment.
9.
ARI shall pay Class Counsel pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.
10.
ARI does not admit liability. ARI's sole motivation for entering into the proposed
Settlement is to dispose expeditiously of the claims asserted against it in the lawsuit by
settlement and compromise rather than incur the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation
and the utilization of internal resources within the corporation, particularly given the amounts at
issue, and the utilization of internal resources within the corporation, because it benefits
employees and because it allows ARI to focus on its business rather than litigation. Accordingly,
neither this Judgment and Final Order, nor the Settlement Agreement, is an admission or
indication by ARI as to the validity of any claims in this Lawsuit, or as to any liability,
wrongdoing or violation of law. Neither this Judgment and Final Order, the Settlement
Agreement, nor any related documents in this proceeding, nor any reports or accounts thereof
shall be used, offered or received in evidence in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or
proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce this
6753148
4
Judgment and Final Order, the Settlement Agreement, and all releases given thereunder, or to
establish the affirmative defenses of res judicata or collateral estoppel barring the pursuit of
claims released in the Settlement Agreement.
11.
The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims of the Plaintiff James
Covington, and the claims of all Class Members, which he or any of them have or could assert
against ARI under any federal and state laws relating to wages owed, payment of wages,
liquidated damages, penalties, interest and all similar and related claims, including among others
all claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act and
which arose and accrued at any time prior to January 10, 2018, including any such claims that
are based upon any facts or claims alleged or which could have been alleged in this Lawsuit.
12.
All other Class Members (a) shall be deemed to be and are forever barred from
instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting any known and unknown claims, suits, lawsuits, demands,
and causes of action which any Class Member may have or hold against ARI for federal and state
laws relating to wages owed, payment of wages, overtime, hours of work, wage statements,
breach of contract to pay wages, and all similar and related claims, including among others all
claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act and which
arose and accrued at any time prior to January 10, 2018, including any such claims that are based
upon any facts or claims alleged or which could have been alleged in this Lawsuit and shall be
deemed to have released, and hereby have released, any and all such claims, suits, lawsuits and
causes of action.
13.
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment and Final Order in any way, the
Court retains continuing jurisdiction (a) to resolve any dispute arising from the interpretation,
enforcement, or implementation of the Settlement Agreement; (b) over implementation of the
6753148
5
Settlement Agreement, until each and every act agreed to be performed pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement has been performed; and (c) over all parties to this action and Class
Members for the purpose of enforcing and administering the Settlement Agreement.
Dated this
"3J. day of May 2018 .
.JHolmes
.~/Irk
J.
United States District Court Judge
6753148
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?