Woodruff v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss and Woodruff's retaliation claims against individual defendants Suzanne Allen, Dewayne Douglas, and Harold Perrin are dismissed without prejudice. Allen, Douglas, and Perrin remain in this case in their indi vidual capacities, however, with respect to Woodruff's claims against them pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Defendants' motion to dismiss the individual defendants [Doc. No. 4 ] is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/25/2017. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
ERICK WOODRUFF
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00203 BSM

CITY OF JONESBORO, ARKANSAS;
and SUZANNE ALLEN; DEWAYNE DOUGLAS;
and MAYOR HAROLD PERRIN in their Individual
and Official Capacities

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Plaintiff Erick Woodruff’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 12] is granted, and his
retaliation claims against individual defendants Suzanne Allen, Dewayne Douglas, and
Harold Perrin are dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Allen, Douglas,
and Perrin remain in this case in their individual capacities, however, with respect to
Woodruff’s claims against them pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. See Compl. ¶ 2, Doc.
No. 2; Doc. No. 7, at 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the individual defendants [Doc. No.
4] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE