Centennial Bank v. Powell

Filing 130

ORDER partly granting and partly denying 122 Motion to reconsider. The Court modifies No. 118 and increases the reasonable fee awarded to Darvish to $19,353.50. The importance of the California law issues in the case does not mean that Darvish should do most of the work in the case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/30/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CENTENNIAL BANK, Guardian of the Estate of Mary Moore Stiny v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM DEFENDANT RENA WOOD ORDER 1. Wood's motion to reconsider, NQ 122, is partly granted and partly denied. 2. Rule 59 doesn't apply because the Court hasn't entered Judgment. Until it does, the Court may reconsider any order, although doing so is disfavored because judicial resources are limited and the Court can't address every issue twice. Here, reconsideration is necessary. The Court jumped the gun. In March it authorized any moving party to reply within sev en calendar days. NQ 77 at 2. But the Court ruled on this fee motion before Wood's time to reply expired, which was a mistake. 3. In light of the parties' new and expanded arguments, the Court modifies NQ 118 and increases the reasonable fee awarded to Darvish to $19,353.50. The $4,000.00 trim covers some routine tasks that could have, and should have, been done by Lilly. And it covers some unnecessary work, such as the emergency motion to extend discovery. The importance of the California law issues in the case does not mean that Darvish should do most of the work in the case. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3o ~ :i.018 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?