Centennial Bank v. Powell
Filing
218
ORDER: Counts I, IV, and V and VII of 37 Second Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Counts II, III, VI, VIII, and IX will go to trial on 12/10/2018. 169 & 174 motions in limine are partly granted and partly denied, with caveats; 176 Motion is granted on the two caregiver orders and otherwise denied; and partly granting and partly denying 171 Motion in limine with caveats. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/28/2018. (jak) (Docket text modified on 11/28/2018 to correct the counts that were dismissed)(jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
CENTENNIAL BANK,
Guardian of the Estate of
Mary Moore Stiny
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM
RENA WOOD
DEFENDANT
ORDER
1. Counts I, IV, V, and VII of Centennial’s second amended
complaint, № 37, are dismissed without prejudice. Counts II, III, VI,
VIII, and IX will go to trial on 10 December 2018.
2. For the reasons stated on the record at the 26 November 2018
hearing, the Court made the following rulings on the evidentiary
issues:
Centennial’s motions in limine, № 169 & 174, are partly granted
and partly denied, with caveats;
Centennial’s motion to take judicial notice, № 176, is granted
on the two caregiver orders and otherwise denied. The Court
will give a limiting instruction; and
Wood’s motion in limine, № 171, is partly granted and partly
denied, with caveats.
So Ordered.
_________________________
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
28 November 2018
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?