Centennial Bank v. Powell

Filing 298

ORDER vacating the Judgment, 43, in case No. 3:17-cv-227 DPM. Though consolidated, the cases remain separate at least for purposes of entering judgment and appellate rights. The 295 Judgment in case No. 3:17-cv-226 DPM remains in place. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/28/2019. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CENTENNIAL BANK, Guardian of the Estate of Mary Moore Stiny PLAINTIFF No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM v. DEFENDANT RENA WOOD IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY MOORE STINY, an incapacitated person No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM ORDER The Court consolidated these cases after removal, directing that all future filings would be in the lead case, No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM. NQ 20. The Court recently filed its Judgment on Centennial Bank's second amended complaint. This Judgment resolved the issues originally in No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM, subject to the Court's continuing jurisdiction on trust administration and collateral issues, but not the issues in No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM, which concern the guardianship of Mrs. Stiny' s estate and the guardianship of her person. The Clerk filed the Judgment in both cases pursuant to standard practice. Though consolidated, the cases remain separate, at least for purposes of entering judgment and appellate rights. Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1130-31 (2018). The Court therefore vacates the Judgment, NQ 43, in case No. 3:17-cv-227-DPM. The Judgment, NQ 295, in case No. 3:17-cv226-DPM, remains in place. So Ordered. V. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?