Centennial Bank v. Powell

Filing 70

ORDER granting 69 Motion to clarify 65 Order. The 3/16/2018 hearing is for a one-hour argument on the pending motions, not for evidence. No party may call witnesses. If a party intends to argue from a paper not already in the record, then it must provide a copy to opposing counsel and the Court by 3/14/2018. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/12/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION CENTENNIAL BANK, Guardian of the Estate of Mary Moore Stiny v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:17-cv-226-DPM RENA WOOD DEFENDANT ORDER The Court grants the motion to clarify, Ng 69, its hearing Order, NQ 65. The March 16th hearing is for a one-hour argument on the pending motions, not for evidence. No party may call witnesses. The Court believes it has all material papers. If a party intends to argue from a paper not already in the record, then it must provide a copy to opposing counsel and the Court by 14 March 2018. The Court directed Baker and Wood to attend primarily so they could consult with, and assist, their lawyers. It is possible, though unlikely, that the Court will put one or both of them under oath to clarify some important fact. Except for that possibility, and any timely disclosed new exhibits, there will be no evidence received at the March 16th hearing. So Ordered. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?