Henson v. Benton et al

Filing 26

ORDER denying 17 Motion to dismiss. If he hasn't already done so, Henson must also respond to Benton's request for production. 23 Motion to appoint counsel denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/7/2018. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVIVSION
KENNETH HENSON
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 3:17-cv-304-DPM

SCOTT BENTON, Detective,
Crittenden County Police Department

DEFENDANT

ORDER

1. Motion to dismiss, NQ 17, denied. Henson has updated his

address with the Court and responded to Benton's interrogatories.
NQ 24 & 25. If he hasn't done so already, Henson must also respond to

Benton's request for production. He need not file that response with
the Court, though.
2. Motion to appoint counsel, NQ 23, denied. Henson has ably
represented himself thus far. And the facts and law aren't so complex
that they warrant appointment at this stage. Plummer v. Grimes, 87 F.3d
1032, 1033 (8th Cir. 1996).
So Ordered.

fr.

D.P. Marshall
United States District Judge

7 J1rflfe oto I f!2