Jackson v. Hino Motors Manufacturing Company USA Inc et al
Filing
14
ORDER: Preliminary Rule 26(f) Report, No. 13, and 12 Motion for scheduling conference noted. The Court looks forward to Hino's timely response to No. 9 so that the Court can rule on the deep issue. The scheduling issues must hang fire. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
FLORIA B. JACKSON
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:17-cv-342-DPM
HINO MOTORS MANUFACTURING
COMP ANY USA, INC.
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Preliminary Rule 26(f) report, Ng 13, and motion for scheduling
conference, NQ 12, noted.
The Court has been trying to figure out
whether this case will stay here or be remanded based on the proposed
diversity-destroying amendment. The Court looks forward to Hino's
timely response to NQ 9 so that the Court can rule on the deep issue.
The scheduling issues must hang fire.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marilia
lJr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?