Jackson v. Hino Motors Manufacturing Company USA Inc et al

Filing 14

ORDER: Preliminary Rule 26(f) Report, No. 13, and 12 Motion for scheduling conference noted. The Court looks forward to Hino's timely response to No. 9 so that the Court can rule on the deep issue. The scheduling issues must hang fire. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION FLORIA B. JACKSON v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:17-cv-342-DPM HINO MOTORS MANUFACTURING COMP ANY USA, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Preliminary Rule 26(f) report, Ng 13, and motion for scheduling conference, NQ 12, noted. The Court has been trying to figure out whether this case will stay here or be remanded based on the proposed diversity-destroying amendment. The Court looks forward to Hino's timely response to NQ 9 so that the Court can rule on the deep issue. The scheduling issues must hang fire. So Ordered. D.P. Marilia lJr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?