Watkins et al v. Velocity Investments LLC et al
Filing
23
ORDER denying 19 Motion to dismiss. The Watkinses have, for reasons given in No. 22 , stated plausible claims. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/17/2018. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
KATRINA WATKINS and
AKILAH WATKINS
v.
PLAINTIFFS
No. 3:18-cv-10-DPM
VELOCITY INVESTMENTS
LLC and ALLEN & WITHROW,
Law Office
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The motion to dismiss the amended complaint, NQ 19, is denied.
The Watkinses have, for the reasons given in NQ 22, stated plausible
claims.
Their case's core is the continuation of the garnishment
proceedings after evidence of exemption was provided. Actual injuries
are alleged. The Court is somewhat skeptical about punitive damages,
but we'll see what the proof shows about the intentions of Allen &
Withrow and Velocity.
So Ordered.
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
17 ~ 'J,.0/8
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
