Sinclair v. Sinclair et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim. The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2020. (wbb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DOMINIQUE SINCLAIR PLAINTIFF No. 3:20-cv-367-DPM v. JIMMY SINCLAIR; BRYANT and THERESA WHITE; FRED WHITFIELD; ALEX DILLARD; SAMUEL DOE DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. granted. Sinclair's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is He reports having no income, no assets, and living with friends. 2. The Court must screen Sinclair's complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. So Ordered. D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?