Sinclair v. Sinclair et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim. The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2020. (wbb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
DOMINIQUE SINCLAIR

PLAINTIFF

No. 3:20-cv-367-DPM

v.

JIMMY SINCLAIR; BRYANT
and THERESA WHITE; FRED
WHITFIELD; ALEX DILLARD;
SAMUEL DOE

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
1.

granted.

Sinclair's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is
He reports having no income, no assets, and living with

friends.
2.

The Court must screen Sinclair's complaint. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2).

Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and

cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim.
Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice.
So Ordered.
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge