Sinclair v. Sinclair et al
Filing
4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim. The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2020. (wbb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
DOMINIQUE SINCLAIR
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:20-cv-367-DPM
v.
JIMMY SINCLAIR; BRYANT
and THERESA WHITE; FRED
WHITFIELD; ALEX DILLARD;
SAMUEL DOE
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1.
granted.
Sinclair's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is
He reports having no income, no assets, and living with
friends.
2.
The Court must screen Sinclair's complaint. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2).
Sinclair's claim that Defendants are using drones and
cameras to threaten him with harm is fanciful and doesn't state a claim.
Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
The Court will dismiss the case without prejudice.
So Ordered.
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?