Hastings v. Wilson et al

Filing 9

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, Hastings' claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted ; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/19/2021. (llg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
STEVEN HASTINGS
ADC #171672
v.

PLAINTIFF
No: 3:21-cv-00181 JM

JEREMY WILSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After carefully considering
the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Hastings’ claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be
taken in good faith
DATED this 19th day of November, 2021.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE