Gillion v. Craighead County Detention Center

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 recommended disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects; dismissing plaintiff's claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; recommending that dismissal of this case count as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/7/2024. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
DEMARION GILLION
#416359
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 3:23-CV-00098-LPR

CRAIGHEAD COUNTY
DETENTION CENTER

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris.1 No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has
expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the case record,
the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court’s findings and conclusions
in all respects.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court recommends that dismissal of this case count
as a “strike,” in the future, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying
Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of February 2024.
________________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Doc. 5.

1