Gillion v. Craighead County Detention Center

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 recommended disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects; dismissing plaintiff's claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; recommending that dismissal of this case count as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/7/2024. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DEMARION GILLION #416359 v. PLAINTIFF No. 3:23-CV-00098-LPR CRAIGHEAD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris.1 No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court’s findings and conclusions in all respects. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court recommends that dismissal of this case count as a “strike,” in the future, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of February 2024. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. 5. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?