Clark v. Admin et al

Filing 12

ORDER dismissing the 2 complaint without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/8/2024. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION VERNA CLARK ADC #712557 v. PLAINTIFF Case No: 3:23-cv-00171-LPR TIGER ADMIN, Law Enforcement Officer (Trumann, AR), et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Verna Clark filed this action pro se.1 On April 25, 2024, the Court issued an Order granting Ms. Clark’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and explaining that her Complaint was deficient for failure to state a claim.2 The Court gave Ms. Clark forty-five days to amend her Complaint, and warned her that failure to file an amended complaint would result in the dismissal of her case.3 Ms. Clark has not complied with, or otherwise responded to, the Court’s April 25th Order, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court’s April 25, 2024 Order, Ms. Clark’s Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July 2024. _______________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Compl. (Doc. 2). 2 Order (Doc. 10). 3 Id.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?