Oliver v. McClain
Filing
3
ORDER withdrawing the reference; denying 1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without prejudice 2 complaint; and alerting Oliver if he wants to pursue this case, he must pay $405 and file a motion to reopen the case by 9/30/2024. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/3/2024. (jak) (Docket text modified on 9/3/2024 to correct the linkage)(jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
ARTEZ OLIVER
No. 3:24-cv-142-DPM
V.
M. McCLAIN, Lt.,
Mississippi County
DEFENDANT
ORDER
1.
The Court withdraws the reference.
2.
Oliver is a three-striker. Before filing this lawsuit, he had at
least three cases dismissed for failing to state a claim. E.g., Oliver v.
Bradley, No. 1:17-cv-102-KGB; Oliver v. Cook, No. 3:17-cv-39-BSM; and
Oliver v. Cook, No. 3:16-CV-350 -DPM. And nothing in his complaint,
Doc. 2, suggests he's currently in imminent danger of serious physical
injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Oliver's motion to proceed inforina pauperis,
Doc. TI, is therefore denied. His complaint will be dismissed without
prejudice.
3.
If Oliver wants to pursue this case, then he must pay $405
(the administrative and filing fees) and file a motion to reopen the case
by 30 September 2024. An informa pauperis appeal from this Order and
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.
§
1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
$
,)
kte
)21
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?