Wiseman v. Depuy Synthes Products Inc et al
Filing
10
ORDER: Certificate of service, Doc. 8 , appreciated; granting as modified 3 motion; the dismissal is without prejudice because Wiseman may be able to allege specific facts showing Johnson & Johnson's involvement or responsibility. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/28/2025. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
WADE WISEMAN
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:24-cv-161-DPM
V.
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC.
and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
DEFENDANTS
[SIRLPIW
1. Certificate of service, Doc. 8, appreciated.
2. Unopposed motion, Doc. 3, granted as modified. Wiseman's
complaint fails to allege enough facts to state a claim against Johnson
& Johnson, Depuy's parent. Epps v. Stewart Information Services Corp.,
327 F.3d 642, 649 (8th Cir. 2003). The modification: This dismissal is
without prejudice because Wiseman may be able to allege specific facts
showing Johnson & Johnson's involvement or responsibility.
So Ordered.
/?;'i-qLQ 2
-
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?