Little Rock School et al v. Pulaski Cty School et al

Filing 5154

ORDER: For the reasons stated at the 20 August 2015 hearing, the Court confirms its ruling about Dr. Guess's current role on desegregation-related issues, including staffing. The Court directs PCSSD, Joshua, and JNPSD to meet monthly on faciliti es-related issues between now and the December status conference. PCSSD will host the September meeting, Joshua will host the October meeting; and JNPSD will host the November meeting. The 16 December 2015 status conference will focus on facilities. The Court will also get an update on the Donaldson Scholars program. Joshua's response brief on the proposed PCSSD /JNPSD detachment agreement is due by 31 August 2015. Replies from PCSSD and JNPSD due by 4 September 2015. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/20/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. v. PLAINTIFFS No. 4:82-cv-866-DPM NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS LORENE JOSHUA, et al. ORDER 1. For the reasons stated at the 20 August 2015 hearing, the Court confirms its ruling about Dr. Guess's current role on desegregation-related issues, including staffing. 2. The Court directs PCSSD, Joshua, and JNPSD to meet monthly on facilities-related issues between now and the December status conference. PCSSD will host the September meeting; Joshua will host the October meeting; and JNPSD will host the November meeting. 3. The 16 December 2015 status conference will focus on facilities. The Court will also get an update on the Donaldson Scholars program. 4. Joshua's response brief on the proposed PCSSD /JNPSD detachment agreement is due by 31 August 2015. Replies from PCSSD and JNPSD due by 4 September 2015. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?