In Re: Prempro Products et al
LETTER ORDER re Plaintiffs' Request for Additional Call Notes; response to this inquiry should be filed by 5 p.m., Tuesday, April 7, 2009; Defendants may respond to Plaintiffs' submission by 5 p.m., Tuesday, April 14, 2009. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/24/09. (mkf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 W. CAPITOL, ROOM D444 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 (501) 604-5140 Facsimile (501) 604-5149
March 24, 2009 Ms. Zoe B. Littlepage Littlepage Booth - Houston 2043A West Main Street Houston , TX 77098 Mr. Michael L. Williams Williams Love O'Leary & Powers, P.C. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 450 Portland, OR 97225-6681 Re: Dear Counsel: In making the case for additional, post-2004 call notes, you asserted that the call notes "have proven to be powerful evidence at trial of Wyeth's influence and misconduct."1 In plenary detail, please provide me with examples of the where, when, and how the call notes were used in cases, and what exactly was proven through their use. Please make specific citations to transcripts. Your response to this inquiry should be filed by 5 p.m., Tuesday, April 7, 2009. Defendants may respond to Plaintiffs' submission by 5 p.m., Tuesday, April 14, 2009. Cordially, /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. In re Prempro, 4:03-CV-01507 Plaintiffs' Request for Additional Call Notes
Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: Mr. Steve Urbanczyk Other Counsel of Record
Doc. No. 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?