Sims v. SSA
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Attorney Fees be granted. It is further recommended that the Commissioner certify and pay to Mr. James W. Stanley, Jr., attorney for Plaintiff, $1,750.00 as attorneys fees, pursuant to the EAJA. Objections to R&R due by 5/15/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/1/09. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SHUNDA SIMS V. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration 4:04CV00665 JMM/JTR PLAINTIFF
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION INS T RUCT IONS Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Attorney's Fees (docket entry #36). Defendant has filed a Response (docket entry #37), and the matter has been referred to this Court for recommended disposition (docket entry #38). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court recommends that the Motion be granted. On July 12, 2004, Plaintiff filed this action challenging the decision of an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") denying her social security benefits (docket entry #2). On February 4, 2009, the Court entered an Order and a Judgment (docket entries #34 and #35) that remanded the case to the ALJ pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000). On February 10, 2009, Plaintiff's attorney, Mr. James W. Stanley, Jr., filed a Motion for Approval of Attorney's Fees. (Docket entry #36.) In this Motion, Mr. Stanley seeks payment for 14.00 hours of work performed by him at the hourly rate of $125.00 ($1,750.00). The Commissioner does not contest Plaintiff's entitlement to an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA and asserts that he has no objection to the amount requested by Plaintiff's attorney
(docket entry #37). Under the EAJA, a prevailing social security claimant is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees unless the Commissioner's position in denying benefits was "substantially justified" or special circumstances make an award unjust. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d)(1)(A). A claimant who wins a sentence four remand order, such as the one entered in this case (docket entry #34), is a prevailing party entitled to EAJA fees. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302 (1993). Under these circumstances, the Court concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA and that the amount requested by Plaintiff's attorney is reasonable. Accordingly, the Court recommends that Plaintiff's attorney receive a total award of $1,750.00 (14.00 hours of attorney time at the rate of $125.00 per hour). IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Attorney's Fees (docket entry #36) be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner certify and pay to Mr. James W. Stanley, Jr., attorney for Plaintiff, $1,750.00 as attorney's fees, pursuant to the EAJA. DATED this 1st day of May, 2009.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?