Rille, et al v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, et al

Filing 222

ORDER granting 216 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/17/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ___________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) VS. ) ) CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California ) Corporation, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) ___________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. NORMAN RILLE AND NEAL ROBERTS, Civil Action 4:04-CV-00988 BRW ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF VARIOUS PAPERS REGARDING RELATORS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF RELATORS’ SHARE AND OPPOSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT’S CROSS MOTION FOR DISMISSAL After consideration of Relators’ Motion to File Under Seal Unredacted Versions of various Papers Regarding Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Determination of Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Dismissal, the Court GRANTS the Motion (Doc. No. 216) and directs the Clerk of this Court to file under seal paper copies of the (a) Unredacted Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Determination of Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Dismissal; and (b) Exhibits 28-30 thereto. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the filing under seal of the unredacted versions of, and service upon Cisco of Relators' Exhibit 29-30 and Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Determination of Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Dismissal, will not constitute waiver of Joint Prosecution and/or Common Interest Privileges with the Government, and/or break the Court previously ordered seal of exhibits in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?