Rille, et al v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, et al
Filing
222
ORDER granting 216 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/17/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
PLAINTIFF,
)
)
VS.
)
)
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California
)
Corporation,
)
)
DEFENDANT.
)
___________________________________ )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ex rel. NORMAN RILLE AND NEAL
ROBERTS,
Civil Action 4:04-CV-00988 BRW
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSIONS
OF VARIOUS PAPERS REGARDING RELATORS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF RELATORS’ SHARE AND
OPPOSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT’S CROSS MOTION FOR DISMISSAL
After consideration of Relators’ Motion to File Under Seal Unredacted Versions of various
Papers Regarding Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Determination of
Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Dismissal, the Court
GRANTS the Motion (Doc. No. 216) and directs the Clerk of this Court to file under seal paper
copies of the (a) Unredacted Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Determination
of Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Dismissal; and (b) Exhibits
28-30 thereto.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the filing under seal of the unredacted versions of, and
service upon Cisco of Relators' Exhibit 29-30 and Relators’ Reply Memorandum in Support of
Motion for Determination of Relators’ Share and Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for
Dismissal, will not constitute waiver of Joint Prosecution and/or Common Interest Privileges with
the Government, and/or break the Court previously ordered seal of exhibits in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?