Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

Filing 38

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Disney Publishing Worldwide. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Deere, Beth)

Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

Doc. 38

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 38

Filed 08/18/2006

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ROBERT STEINBUCH v. Case No.: 4:06-CV-0000 620-WRW PLAINTIFF

JESSICA CUTLER; HYPERION BOOKS; DISNEY PUBLISHING WORLDWIDE; HOME BOX OFFICE; AND TIME WARNER

DEFENDANTS

RULE 12(b)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS SEPARATE DEFENDANT DISNEY PUBLISHING WORLDWIDE FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Disney Publishing Worldwide ("DPW"), for its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), states: 1. This lawsuit arises out of the publication of a book, The

Washingtonienne (the "Book"), authored by separate defendant Jessica Cutler. In his First Amended Complaint, the plaintiff alleges that publication of the Book constituted an invasion of his privacy and subjected him to intentional infliction of emotional distress. 2. Plaintiff has sued DPW, among other defendants, but this Court has

no personal jurisdiction over DPW, either specific or general. 3. The Court cannot exercise specific personal jurisdiction over DPW

because DPW has no connection with the conduct that allegedly caused the plaintiff's injuries in this case, i.e., the distribution of the Book. That is, there is no nexus between DPW and the plaintiff's alleged injuries in this case.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 38

Filed 08/18/2006

Page 2 of 5

4.

There is no general jurisdiction over DPW in Arkansas because

DPW lacks sufficient minimum contacts with this State to support an exercise of general personal jurisdiction over it in Arkansas. 5. As set out in the Affidavit of Vincent Loncto, DPW's Senior Vice

President, DPW is a corporation organized and operated under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business in the State of California. (Exhibit A) 6. DPW was not responsible for the distribution of The

Washingtonienne. DPW did not contract with any entity for the distribution of the Book. In fact, DPW played no part in either the publication or the distribution of The Washingtonienne. DPW did not contract with the author of the Book or make payments to the author of the Book. (Exhibit A) Upon information and belief, the Book was published by separate defendant Hyperion, an imprint of Buena Vista Books, Inc. ("Buena Vista Books"). 7. DPW does not have bank accounts, telephone listings, real estate, or

personal property in Arkansas. (Exhibit A) 8. DPW does not maintain an office in Arkansas and has no agent for

service of process in this State. (Exhibit A) 9. DPW does not "transact business" within the State of Arkansas, as

that term is defined in Ark. Code Ann. § 4-27-1501. (Exhibit A)

2

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 38

Filed 08/18/2006

Page 3 of 5

10.

Buena Vista Books is a subsidiary corporation of DPW. Hyperion,

an imprint of Buena Vista Books, Inc, is a division of Buena Vista Books and not of DPW. (Exhibit A) 11. DPW and Buena Vista Books are separate corporate entities and

have separate employees. DPW and Buena Vista Books maintain separate payrolls. (Exhibit A) 12. (Exhibit A) 13. DPW does not control the business operations and affairs of Buena DPW and Buena Vista Books maintain separate books and records.

Vista Books; nor does it approve significant business decisions of Buena Vista Books. (Exhibit A) 14. Buena Vista Books is responsible for the conduct of its own day-to-

day business activities. (Exhibit A) 15. Buena Vista Books does not hold itself out to be an agent for DPW

and is not authorized to act for DPW without its consent. 16. Under settled Arkansas and Eighth Circuit precedent, DPW cannot

be held liable for the acts of its subsidiary corporation, Buena Vista Books, unless the plaintiff can produce evidence to permit the Court to pierce the corporate veil between the two corporations by finding that DPW is the alter ego of Buena Vista Books. 17. Plaintiff has not pleaded, nor can he prove, that DPW is the alter ego

of Buena Vista Books. The proof is directly to the contrary. (Exhibit A)
3

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 38

Filed 08/18/2006

Page 4 of 5

WHEREFORE, DPW respectfully prays that the Court dismiss it from this lawsuit, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), for lack of personal jurisdiction; award it reasonable costs and attorneys' fees; and grant it all proper relief.

WILLIAMS & ANDERSON PLC 111 Center Street Twenty-Second Floor Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 [phone] [phone] (facsimile) E-mail: [e-mail] By: /s/ Beth Deere__ Philip S. Anderson, Ark. Bar # 60001 Jess L. Askew, Ark. Bar # 86005 Beth M. Deere, Ark. Bar #86050 Clayborne S. Stone, Ark. Bar # 2003102

Attorneys for Separate Defendant Disney Publishing Worldwide

4

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 38

Filed 08/18/2006

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 18th day of August, 2006, I served a copy of the foregoing document via the Court's ECF/Pacer electronic filing system upon the following persons: Jonathan Rosen, Esquire 1645 Lamington Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 Attorney for Plaintiff Claire Hancock, Esquire M.N. Norton, Esquire Gary D. Marts, Esquire Wright, Lindsey & Jennings 200 West Capitol Avenue, #2200 Little Rock, AR 72201 Attorneys for Separate Defendants Time Warner and Home Box Office __/s/ Beth Deere ___________________ Beth Deere

5