Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

Filing 52

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 38 28 44 40 MOTIONS to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; Pltf's response must be filed by 5 p.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2006; all discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of the motions to dismiss . Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr. on 9/11/06. (mkf, )

Download PDF
Steinbuch v. Cutler et al Doc. 52 Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW Document 52 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT STEINBUCH PLAINTIFF 4:06CV00620 WRW JESSICA CUTLER, et al. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time Until November 15, 2006 to File a Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 46). Defendants have responded and Plaintiff has replied.1 The motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Although Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is granted, his response must be filed by 5 p.m., Tuesday, October 10, 2006, rather than the requested date. Additionally, all discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of the motions to dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2006. DEFENDANTS /s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 See Doc. Nos. 47, 49, and 50. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?