Williams v. Does et al

Filing 86

ORDER adopting 84 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Defts' 77 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/12/08. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION MICHAEL W. WILLIAMS ADC #112812 V. DOES et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 4:06CV00861 SWW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #77) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 12th day of November, 2008. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?