Archer et al v. Singh et al
Filing
140
ORDER granting 138 Motion to Clarify. Pursuant to Rule 33, all discovery submitted by Plaintiffs subsequent to & including Plaintiffs' Fifth Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production are null and ineffective. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/15/08. (jct)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DEWAYNE AND NELDA ARCHER V. RAGHU SINGH, M.D.; AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ORDER Pending is Defendant Raghu Singh, M.D.'s Motion for Clarification of the Court's Order Granting Relief from Discovery. Pursuant to Rule 33, all discovery submitted by Plaintiff subsequent to and including Plaintiffs' Fifth Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production are null and ineffective. Motion for Clarification (Docket # 138) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of September 2008. 4:06CV001657 JMM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFFS
______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
