Steinbuch v. Cutler

Filing 10

MOTION to Clarify by Robert Steinbuch. (Rosen, Jonathan)

Download PDF
Steinbuch v. Cutler Doc. 10 Case 4:06-mc-00028-WRW Document 10 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS __________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA INDEX NO. 4:06-MC-0028-WRW ISSUED BY DEFENDANT IN THE CASE OF STEINBUCH V. CUTLER (DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 01:05-CV-00970) ___________________________________________ MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION Today this Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion to quash. In the Court's Order, the Court stated that UALR may redact the name of student evaluators. The undersigned asks for clarification on the matter of redaction, as there were two issues regarding students' identities. First, was the issue of students' identification in documents. Those can be redacted, as per the Court's Order. The second issue was regarding anonymous student comments. The Administration of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock School of Law indicated that, given that these comments are anonymous, they could not lead to relevant information because "the law school . . . do[e]n't have any way to verify the reliability - or even the truth - of the[m]." Accordingly, the undersigned requests clarification whether the anonymous, unverified comments from students are also to be produced. Dated: September 21, 2006 Respectfully Submitted, _/s/ Jonathan Rosen___ Jonathan Rosen 1645 Lamington Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 (908) 759-1116 Attorney for Plaintiff Case 4:06-mc-00028-WRW Document 10 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I caused the attached copy of Plaintiff's Reply to be served on Matt Billips, 730 Peachtree Rd, Atlanta, GA 30308, by placing it in a US Mail Box today, September 21, 2006. /s/ Jonathan Rosen Jonathan Rosen, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?