Thompson v. RTC Research & Development LLC et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting 41 Motion to Stay, which applies to the GTC defts only. The GTC defts and pltf are directed to file a status report on August 1, 2007; and the remaining defts and pltf are still required to file their rule 26(f) report on June 25, 2007. Signed by Judge James M Moody on 6/11/07. (bkp)

Download PDF
Thompson v. RTC Research & Development LLC et al Doc. 46 Case 4:07-cv-00017-JMM Document 46 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MYSTIC THOMPSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED VS. CASE NO. 4:07CV0017 JMM PLAINTIFF GOEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDE R Defendants Goen Technologies, Trimspa, Nutramerica Corporation, and Alexander Goen (the "GTC" defendants) unopposed motion for stay is granted (#41). The GTC defendants and the plaintiff are directed to file a status report on this case on August 1, 2007 to advise the Court as to the status of the parallel nationwide class action proceeding in California styled Belka La Rosa v. Nutramerica Corporation, et al.. Because this stay only applies to the GTC defendants, the remaining defendants and plaintiff are still required to file their rule 26(f) report on June 25, 2007. Dated this 11 day of June, 2007. James M. Moody United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?