Mack v. Dillon et al
ORDER setting a motion hearing for 3/24/2011 at 1:30 PM in Little Rock Courtroom # B-155 before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on plaintiff's 132 Motion to Substitute Counsel; Plaintiff's attorney is directed to file a complete copy of Mack 9;s deposition by 3/15/2011; the Clerk is directed to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to the Warden having custody of Dolandon Mack and to the U.S. Marshal's Service, commanding that Mack be brought before the Court for the 3/24/2011 hearing, and detained here until the end of the 4/18/2011 trial.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/10/2011. (mkf)
Mack v. Dillon et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DOLANDON MACK Reg. #23050-009 v. TIM DILLON AND JANA RAYBURN ORDER The Court will hear argument on Mack's motion to substitute counsel, Document No. 132, on 24 March 2011 at 1:30 in the afternoon. Mack's lawyer recently filed his own motion to withdraw, Document No. 131. The Court directed Sanders to file this motion ex parte to avoid c o m p r o m i s i n g t h e attorney-client privilege. In light of Mack's motion, however, Sanders should re-file his motion to withdraw using regular procedures. Sanders must send Mack a copy of Sanders's motion and this Order by overnight mail. The Court will also consider Sanders's motion at the hearing. The Court also requests that Sanders file a complete copy of Mack's deposition by 15 March 2011. Finally, the Court authorizes the Clerk to issue Case No. 4:07-cv-74-DPM PLAINTIFF
a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to the Warden having custody of Mack, and to the U.S. Marshal's Service, commanding that Mack be brought before the Court for the March 24th hearing, detained here until the end of the April 18th trial, and brought before the Court during the trial. So Ordered.
______________________________________ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 10 March 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?