Maida et al v. Sherman et al

Filing 103

JUDGMENT re 102 Order granting Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/11/09. (bkp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DOMINICK MAIDA, ET AL. vs. NO. 4:07CV001151 BSM DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Order entered this date, judgment is granted for plaintiffs and against defendants as follows: 1) arising out of the "credit repair program," in favor of Dominick and Dorthy Maida against all defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,698.00 plus prejudgment interest at the rate of six percent from September 20, 2005 through entry of judgment, trebled pursuant to RICO; 2) with regard to the $25,000.00 investment, in favor of Maida, Inc. jointly and severally against all defendants, in the amount of $25,000.00 plus interest at the rate of six percent from May 12, 2006, trebled pursuant to RICO; 3) arising out of the Marianna House purchase, in favor of Dominck Maida, and jointly and severally against all defendants, in the amount of $15,733.65 initially received by defendants as "commission," and prejudgment interest at the rate of six percent from September 24, 2007, through judgment, trebled pursuant to RICO; 4) arising out of damages suffered arising from the Marianna house purchase, in favor PLAINTIFFS

SAMANTHA SHERMAN, ET AL.

of Dominck Maida and against all defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $8,320.00, trebled pursuant to RICO; 5) arising out of the VGRT REIT, in favor of the Maidas, and against all defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $3,000.00 plus prejudgment interest at the rate of six percent per annum since January 16, 2007, trebled pursuant to RICO; 6) arising from the Battery House actions, in favor of the Maidas and against all defendants except Jerry Johnson, in the nominal amount of $1.00, trebled pursuant to RICO; 7) $1,170.00 in costs and fees previously awarded by the court against defendant Samantha Sherman; and 8) with respect to each defendant, reasonable costs and attorney's fees along with post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2009.

________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-