Jones v. Holladay et al

Filing 89

ORDER adopting 87 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the Court's Order, and failure to prosecute; all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 78 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/10/09. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION JEROME JONES V. DOC HOLLADAY et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply NO: 4:08CV00024 JLH DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF with the Court's order, and failure to prosecute. 2. 3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 10th day of February, 2009. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?