TE Products Pipeline Company LLC v. Davidson Ranch Inc
ORDER granting 92 Motion to Vacate and vacating 62 Judgment, 61 and Order dated June 1, 2009, and dismissing the Complaint and Counterclaim with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/18/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
TE PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. DAVIDSON RANCH, INC. CASE NO. 4-08-CV000204 SWW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
. ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF JUNE 1.2009
On this day comes o n for hearing the j o i n t motion ofthe parties to vacate t h e Court's Order and Judgment entered June 1,2009 so that they might resolve the issue between th.ci;m privately and at less cost in time and money. 1. From the joint motion and other matters appearing to the Court, it appears that
the grounds stated in the joint motion justify the relief requested pursuant to Rule 60, Federal . Rules of Civil Procedure, and that the Court's Judgment and Order dated June 1,2009 should be vacated and held for naught. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Court's Order dated June 1, 2009 and Judgment dated June 1, 2009 are hereby vacated, set aside and held for naught; and the Complaint and Counterclaim dismissed with prejudice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATE:_.....!..\_L_-------=\8~-_C------::t;=-- _ _ '
Hetbert C. Ruitffi(aA:#64~03:=:7~) - - - Rose Law Firm, a Professional Association 120 East Fourth Street Little Rock, ansas 2201-2893 roselawfirm.com (501) 3 5- 1 / D E P, ODDeTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC Attorn
e . ells, AR Bar No. 2003153 les D . "Skip" Davidson, AR Bar No. 73026
Davidso 'Law Firm, Ltd.
724 Garland, Cantrell at State P.O. Box 1300 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 374-9977 / Fax: (501) 374-5917 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org -andQuattlebaum, Grooms, Tull & Burrow, PLLC 111 Center St., Ste. 1900 Little Rock, AR 72201
E-mail: email@example.com Attorneysjor Davidson Ranch, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?