USA v. Alexander
GARNISHMENT ORDER directing Garnishee, Molex, Inc., to pay 25% of deft's net wages per pay period and continue said payments until the debt to the plaintiff is paid in full or until the garnishee no longer has control of any property belonging to the debtor or until further Order of this Court. Said payments to be sent to the U.S. Dept. of Justice Facility, Nationwide Central Intake, P.O. Box 790363, St. Louis, MO 63179-0363. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/5/12. (kpr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
NO. 4:08CV00369 BRW
A Writ of Continuing Garnishment, directed to Garnishee, has been duly issued
and served upon the Garnishee. Pursuant to the Writ of Continuing Garnishment, the
Garnishee filed an Answer on April 23, 2012, stating that at the time of the service of the
Writ he had in his possession or under his control personal property belonging to and due
defendant, and that garnishee was indebted to the defendant in the sum of $388.84
disposable net wages per week. As of June 5, 2012, the defendant is indebted to the
United States in the sum of $29.922.11 with interest accruing at the legal rate.
On April 24, 2012, the defendant was notified of his right to a hearing and has
not requested a hearing to determine exempt property. The United States is entitled to
25% of the defendant’s disposable weekly net wages of $388.84.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Garnishee pay 25% of defendants’ net
wages per pay period and continue said payments until the debt to the plaintiff is paid in
full or until the garnishee no longer has custody, possession or control of any property
belonging to the debtor or until further Order of this court.
Said payments should be sent to the U.S. Department of Justice Facility,
Nationwide Central Intake, P.O. Box 790363, St. Louis, MO 63179-0363.
Dated: June 5, 2012.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?