Liu et al v. Mehlin et al
JUDGMENT re 54 Jury Verdict in favor of plaintiff Tie-Lei Liu in the sum of $369,906.11, in favor of plaintiff Xiao-Dong Chen, M.D., the sum of $10,000.00 together with interest at the rate of.50% per annum; plaintiffs to take nothing on their complaint against deft Karen J. Kozlowski, M.D.. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/8/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TIE-LEI LIU AND XIAO-DONG CHEN, M.D. VS . NO. 4:08CV000415 PLAINTIFFS
BECCA MEHLIN, A.N.P., AND LITTLE ROCK GYNECOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC., AND KAREN J. KOZLOWSKI, M.D.
JUDGMENT This action came on for trial May 4, 2009, before the Court and a jury, the Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge presiding. The issues having been duly tried, and after deliberating thereon, the jury returned a verdict on May 7, 2009, in favor of the Plaintiffs, Tie-Lei Liu and Xiao-Dong Chen, M.D. against Defendant Becca Mehlin, A.N.P. and in favor of Defendant Karen J. Kozlowski on Plaintiffs claims. IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff, Tie-Lei Liu recover of and from the Defendants, Becca Mehlin, A.N.P. and Little Rock Gynecology Associates, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $369,906.11, three hundred and sixty nine thousand, nine hundred and six dollars and eleven cents ($369,906.11) together with interest from this date until the date paid at the rate of .50 %per annum. Plaintiff, Xiao-Dong Chen, M.D. shall recover of and from the Defendants, Becca Mehlin, A.N.P. and Little Rock Gynecology Associates, Inc., jointly and severally, the sum of $10,000.00, ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) together with interest from this date until the date paid at the rate of .50 %per annum. Plaintiffs take nothing on this complaint against Defendant, Karen J. Kozlowski, M.D.
Dated this 8th day of May, 2009.
James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?