Porter v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
ORDER denying 54 Motion to Stay. Defendant is directed to post a supersedeas bond in the amount of $400,000. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 6/5/09. (dac)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT PORTER v. 4:08-CV-00637-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER
Pending is Defendant's Motion to Stay the Court's Order Pending Appeal (Doc. No. 54). Plaintiff has responded (Doc. No. 58). Defendant's Motion asked the Court to stay, pending appeal, the enforcement of the Court's April 23, 2009, Order and Judgment, without the necessity of posting a bond.1 Defendant points out that it has ample ability to pay any judgment in this action.2 In support of its position, Defendant cites The Hartford's 2008 revenue of $9.2 billion, and "A" rating from both Standard & Poor's and A.M. Best.3 Plaintiff's Response disputed Defendant's ability to pay, pointing out that The Hartford has been approved by the U.S. Government for $3.4 Billion in TARP money.4 Defendant believes that, if it loses on appeal, it will unlikely owe Plaintiff more than $400,000, and Plaintiff would be satisfied if Defendant posted bond in that amount.5
Doc. No. 55. Id. Id. Doc. No. 58. Doc. Nos. 55, 58. 1
Defendant's Motion is DENIED. Defendant is directed to post a supersedeas bond in the amount of $400,000. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2009.
/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.____________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?