United Communications Corporation v. AMR International Inc

Filing 45

JUDGMENT re 44 Order Dismissing Case and awarding to plaintiff a total judgment in the amount of $215,039.65, together with interest from this date until the date paid at a rate of .36% per annum. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/16/09. (bkp) (Docket text modified on 10/19/2009 to correct the description of the document filed.) (thd).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION UNITED COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION V. AMR INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. ECOLOGICAL NETWORKING SYSTEMS, LTD, ET. AL THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT NO. 4:08CV03004 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this date, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, United Communications Corporation be and is hereby awarded judgment of, and from, Defendant, AMR International, Inc. as follows: in the amount of One Hundred Thirty-Six Thousand, Four Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Forty-Seven Cents ($136,467.47) plus interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from July 31, 2008 to date in the amount of Thirteen Thousand, Six Hundred Forty-Six Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents ($13,646.74); in the amount of Sixty Thousand, Six Hundred Forty-Six Dollars and Fifty-Two Cents ($60,646.52), plus interest at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum on the principal portion of Forty-Eight Thousand, Four Hundred Eighty-Four Dollars and Eighty-Nine Cents ($48,484.89) from July 31, 2008 to date in the amount of Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Eight Dollars and Ninety-Two Cents ($4,278.92). For a total Judgment in the amount of Two Hundred and Fifteen Thousand and Thirty-Nine Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($215,039.65) together with interest from 1 this date until the date paid at a rate of .36% per annum. DATED this 16th day of October, 2009. ______________________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?