United Communications Corporation v. AMR International Inc
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Reconsideration 4 and dismissing with prejudice the Counterclaim filed by AMR International Inc against UCC. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/5/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION UNITED COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION V. AMR INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. ECOLOGICAL NETWORKING SYSTEMS, LTD, ET. AL ORDE R On October 16, 2009 the Court entered an Order striking Defendant AMRI's Answer and dismissing AMRI's Counterclaim against UCC and Third Party Claims without prejudice. Judgment was entered in favor of UCC on the same date. On October 20, 2009, UCC filed a motion for reconsideration asking the Court to reconsider the dismissal of AMRI's Counterclaim against it without prejudice. (Docket # 46). UCC argues that AMRI's Counterclaim against it should be dismissed with prejudice. AMRI failed to respond to the motion. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The Court finds AMRI's repeated failure to comply with this Court's Orders "willful." Further, AMRI's failure to contact the Court since July, 2009, despite Court Orders to do so constitutes a continued and persistent failure to prosecute its Counterclaim. See, Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F. 3d 402 (8th Cir. 2008). Additionally, the Court finds that AMRI's Counterclaim was a compulsory counterclaim which was required to be asserted and prosecuted in this action. The default judgment in this action bars AMRI from asserting this claim in a subsequent action. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. 13, Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT NO. 4:08CV03004 DEFENDANT
Group, 973 F. 2d 155, 160 (2nd Cir. 1992) and Taylor v. City of Ballwin, Mo., 859 F.2d 1330, 1333, n. 7 (8th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, the Court finds that AMRI's Counterclaim against UCC should be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of November, 2009.
____________________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?