Rutledge v. Saline County Detention Facility
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2); and certifying, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an informa pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 11/24/08. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION JOHN MICHAEL RUTLEDGE PLAINTIFF V. 4:08CV03448 GTE
SALINE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 24th day of November, 2008.
_/s/ Garnett Thomas Eisele______ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?