Blakley v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al

Filing 64

ORDER denying 60 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Replies due by noon on 7/27/2010). Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 7/20/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Blakley v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al Doc. 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RELENTHIS BLAKLEY v. 4:08CV04120-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP. ORDER Pending is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Court Ordered Discovery Responses, and For Sanctions (Doc. No. 60), and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. No. 61). Defendant has responded.1 Discovery ended on June 20, 2010.2 Plaintiff failed to bring any continuing discovery disputes to my attention until after this date,3 and has not shown good cause for the delay.4 Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED in part: Plaintiff must respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by noon, July 27, 2010. If Defendant wants to reply, it should be filed by noon, August 3, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2010. /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. Nos. 62, 63. Doc. No. 54. Doc. No. 55, 57. See Doc. Nos. 56, 57, 62, 63. 1 2 3 4 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?