Jones v. Gilbert et al
ORDER adopting 6 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE purs to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 USC 1915(g); if Pltf wishes to continue with this case he must, within 30 days of the entry of this Order, submit the $350 filing fee noting this case style and number, and file a motion to reopen the case; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/4/08. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION KEITHEN JONES ADC #85316 V. 4:08CV04129 WRW/JTR DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (docket entry #1) is DENIED. This § 1983 action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to the three PLAINTIFF
JASON GILBERT, Patrolman, Little Rock Police Department, et al.
strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. If Plaintiff wishes to continue with this case, he must, within thirty days of the
entry of this Order: (a) pay the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, noting the above case style and number; and (b) file a Motion to Reopen the case. 4. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 4th day of December, 2008. /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?