Cortez et al v. S N Servicing et al
ORDER re 2 Complaint filed by ChanDra Lyons Cortez, Cornelio Cortez directing the plaintiffs to amend the complaint within 30 days. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/29/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS CORTEZ, CORNELIO CORTEZ Plaintiff, VS. S N SERVICING, SHAPRIO LAW FIRM Defendant. Order * * * * * * * * * * *
NO: 4:09CV00057 JMM
Plaintiffs commenced this action pro se. Their claims appear to involve a mortage. Along with the complaint, Plaintiffs filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion for appointment of counsel. The Eighth Circuit has instructed that the decision of whether a complaint is frivolous or malicious precedes the decision of whether to grant in forma pauperis status and whether to order service of process. See Carney v. Houston 33 F.3d 893, 895 (8th Cir. 1994)(quoting Gentile v. Missouri Dept. Of Corrections, 986 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1993)). "If the complaint is frivolous or malicious, the district court should dismiss it out of hand." Id. A complaint is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325-27 (1989). Plaintiffs' complaint in this case is incomprehensible. Therefore, the Court will dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint unless they amend the complaint to specify the facts upon which the claims are based and the alleged violations of the law. Plaintiff must file an amended
complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the complaint. SO ORDERED this 29th day of January 2009.
____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?