Askew v. Holladay et al
ORDER adopting 61 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint against defts is DISMISSED with prejudice, and all pending motions are DENIED as moot; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/5/10. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION FRANK W. ASKEW, JR. ADC #082276 V. 4:09-cv-00058-JMM-JJV PLAINTIFF
RICHARD SCOTT, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Facility; EDDIEMAE BANKS, Classification Officer, Pulaski County Detention Facility; MICHELLE BAILEY CONNERS, Classification Officer, Pulaski County Detention Facility; and DONNA SPENCER, Nurse, Pulaski County Detention Facility
ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the parties' objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. In his Objections, Plaintiff also requests a transcript of the evidentiary hearing held on December 1, 2009. However, a transcript of this hearing is not available. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice, and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Court FURTHER CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 5th day of January , 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?