Lube v. Travelers Indemnity Company

Filing 29

ORDER denying 17 Motion for Protective Order; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/9/09. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER LUBE v. 4:09-CV-00063-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY ORDER Pending are Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (Doc. No. 17) and Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff has responded.1 Defendant's Motions are DENIED. If Plaintiff's Response2 to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss3 does not adequately explain the alleged deficiencies in Plaintiff's discovery responses, Defendant may file a motion to compel if it wishes. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2009. /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. Nos. 27, 28. Doc. No. 28. Doc. No. 19. 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?