West v. Actavis Group hf et al

Filing 8

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER transferring case to the Southern District of West Virginia to be included in MDL No. 1968, In Re: Digitek Products Liability Litigation. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi of the Panel.(bkp)

Download PDF
By Denise Morgan-Stone on May 08, 2009 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: DIGITEK PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-13) Apr 22, 2009 MDL No. 1968 On August 13, 2008, the Panel transferred eight civil actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 571 F.Supp.2d 1376 (J.P.M.L. 2008). Since that time, 99 additional actions have been transferred to the Southern District of West Virginia. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin. It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of West Virginia and assigned to Judge Goodwin. Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of West Virginia for the reasons stated in the order of August 13, 2008, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: May 08, 2009 ___________________________ Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Page 1 of 2 IN RE: DIGITEK PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION SCHEDULE CTO-13 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST. DIV. C.A. # ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 4 09-189 ARE 4 09-190 ARE 4 09-191 ARE 4 09-192 CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 09-2244 CAC 2 09-2245 FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 2 09-155 KENTUCKY EASTERN KYE 5 09-120 KYE 6 09-116 KENTUCKY WESTERN KYW 3 09-234 KYW 3 09-251 KYW 4 09-23 KYW 5 09-51 MICHIGAN EASTERN MIE 2 09-11305 CASE CAPTION Thomas Beck v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Lois McClellan v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Deller West v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Robert Bell v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Michael Everett, etc. v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. Mary Clare Register v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. Delores A. Fehlberg v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Rita Manley, et al. v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Pheby Thomas, etc. v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Carla York, et al. v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. Henrietta Keen v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Alexandrea Svenningsen v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Barbara McKendree, etc. v. Actavis Group hf, et al. David W. Weiland, etc. v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. MDL No. 1968 MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN MSN 1 09-65 William Russell, etc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. MSN 2 09-53 Nancy E. Muse v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. SOUTH DAKOTA SD 4 09-4034 TENNESSEE MIDDLE TNM 3 09-272 Darlene Stoffel, et al. v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. John Black v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Page 2 of 2 MDL No. 1968 - Schedule CTO-13 Tag-Along Actions (Continued) DIST. DIV. C.A. # TENNESSEE WESTERN TNW 1 09-1057 TNW 1 09-1066 TNW 2 09-2140 TEXAS EASTERN TXE 2 09-98 UTAH UT 2 09-225 CASE CAPTION Dorothy Ivey, et al. v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Charles Denson, et al. v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Billy Childs v. Actavis Group hf, et al. Willie Criss, et al. v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al. Betty Chantrill v. Myland Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?