Ameri v. Bailey et al
Filing
6
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, andadjudged that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Further, the Court certifies,pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment andthe accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 4/17/09. (hph)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
NASSER AHMED AMERI # 1591K V. 4:09CV00212 GTE
PLAINTIFF
BERMARD C. BAILEY; BILL SHEETS; and VIISAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 17th day of April, 2009.
_/s/ Garnett Thomas Eisele__________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
