Eagle v. Henry et al
ORDER granting 55 Motion to Quash; granting 60 Motion for Protective Order; and directing the parties to respond within 30 days to plaintiff's discovery requests following an entry of an order on each of the motions to dismiss. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/14/09. (bkp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BENJAMIN L. EAGLE v. JUDY S. HENRY, et al. ORDER Before the court is a motion for protective order filed by defendant Judge Willard Proctor [Doc. No. 53], a motion to quash and for a protective order filed by defendants Bank of America, N.A., Nancy L. Hollis, Judy S. Henry, Kimberly W. Tucker, and Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, LLP [Doc. No. 55], and an unopposed motion for protective order filed by defendants Pat O'Brien and Steve Sipes [Doc. No. 60]. The motions are granted. All defendants have filed motions to dismiss. On October 13, 2009, this court entered an order granting multiple motions to hold the Rule 26(f) conference in abeyance, and to conduct the Rule 26(f) conference before a magistrate judge. [Doc. No. 62]. In accordance with that order, this court also grants the defendants' motions for protective orders and to quash discovery. Following entry of an order on each of the motions to dismiss, the parties have thirty (30) days to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of October, 2009. CASE NO. 4:09cv0320 BSM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?