Castro-Gomez v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al

Filing 9

AMENDED ORDER ; Defendant Faulkner County, Arkansas was inadvertently omitted from 7 Order. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 7/31/09. (mkf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OSCAR CASTRO-GOMEZ v. 4:09CV00381-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF FAULKNER COUNTY, ARKANSAS, et al. AMENDED ORDER1 Pending is Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 2). Defendants Faulkner County Arkansas, Karl Byrd, John Randall, and Bobby Brown ("Defendants") have responded.2 Also pending is Defendants' Motion For Leave to File Answer Out of Time (Doc. No. 5). Defendants' filed their Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time two days after the answer was due. Defendants' Motion explained the delay in filing the answer. The delay does not appear to have been a willful violation of court rules. Because Defendants filed their Motion just two days after the answer was due, and because Defendants' failure to file did not appear to be an intentional delay, Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED as to Defendants Byrd, Randall, and Brown. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2009. /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order has been Amended only to include Defendant Faulkner County, Arkansas, which was inadvertently omitted from the previous Order. Doc. No. 7. 2 1 Doc. No. 4.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?